Putting Americans First: International prices in context

Putting Americans First: International prices in context

tablets

It is often taken as a given that drug prices in the U.S. are higher than those in other nations. And while there is a difference in price, that difference is often exaggerated and taken out of context.

First, Americans do not spend more on retail prescription drugs as a percentage of overall health spending.

The reason? The prices of hospital care and physician services in other countries. No one calls out the vast gulf between the cost of a coronary bypass in the U.S. versus overseas or the higher fees charged by specialists. Instead, pharmaceuticals have become an easy scapegoat, even though—ironically—medical treatment can reduce the chances of interaction with the truly expensive parts of the health care system.

Second, differences in spending should be adjusted to account for different GDP and purchasing power between countries, a point acknowledged by proposals for international reference pricing. Japan’s GDP by that measure is nearly 40% lower than that of the U.S. Greece’s is half of the U.S. figure, which impacts pricing more broadly.

Finally, nowhere else in the world does as good a job at transitioning to generic medicines once a medicine’s patents have expired. This provides the budgetary “headroom” for broader use of new medicines.

BIO’s View: The cost of medicine in the U.S. must be viewed in a broad context, including how the high prices of other medical products and services compare to international prices and how those differences boost the value of medicines in the U.S. market. The role of generic medicines in creating budgetary headroom for breakthroughs can’t be underestimated and is at the core of a compromise that allows American patients both the most innovative new medicines and the lowest-cost generics.

Scroll to Top